In 2011 I learned the Utah flag I had seen my whole life was not the correct flag. I was amazed how pretty the correct one was. I voted to have the flag manufacturers start making the correct Utah flag. If you have a flag that was made between 1922 and 2011, you can still use it but look at a newer flag. Some want to change our current flag but have not seen or compared our current correct Utah flag.
https://onlinelibrary.utah.gov/symbols/flag.html
See also
https://onlinelibrary.utah.gov/symbols/images/FlagLarge.jpg
Thursday, February 14, 2019
Saturday, December 22, 2018
The year Christmas Changed
The year Christmas Changed.
It was 14 years ago, that I watched my dad die. I called my wife Aleta from the hospital to go over to my mom's to tell her. I later took my mom to pick out a coffin. We didn't have the funeral until the 30th and we still "had Christmas" but some things were not done that year. No business related Christmas cards. Almost no gifts. Even though I knew and still know I will see my dad again, that (cards and gifts) wasn't important. Family was important. Christ was important. I have no idea how many people were offended I didn't send them a card or gift.
It was 14 years ago, that I watched my dad die. I called my wife Aleta from the hospital to go over to my mom's to tell her. I later took my mom to pick out a coffin. We didn't have the funeral until the 30th and we still "had Christmas" but some things were not done that year. No business related Christmas cards. Almost no gifts. Even though I knew and still know I will see my dad again, that (cards and gifts) wasn't important. Family was important. Christ was important. I have no idea how many people were offended I didn't send them a card or gift.
Some things have caused me to still be more outwardly engaged with "the
season". Several years my church ward has had a Christmas Card
exchange. Aleta and I would print out a hundred or so one page Christmas
Cards, and go over to the ward and help sort the many thousands of
"cards" that would be delivered by our youth. Our ward didn't do it this
year, so no cards again.
Our Rotary Club has had a Sub for Santa for the Family Support Center. We buy gifts for a few families. This year, as a club they didn't fit in a large SUV. One year I went with my wife to pick out a couple of coats. One on this lady's list was over $100. it was a coat a contractor would buy to stay warm. I realized I hadn't ever purchased that nice of a coat for my wife, but she didn't say anything. This year we got 20 stockings and a few items to go with others for our Rotary project. We had our annual wrapping dinner and party. I made a note that "Santa" would need a ride later this year. It was neat to see the kids sit on his knee.
Christmas includes a few gifts, some of my wife's Rice Crispy treats to deliver to a few in the ward. What it really is: reading a couple of chapters in Matthew and Luke, one in Helaman, and one in 3rd Nephi. It means that because of Jesus and his atonement and resurrection, I didn't lose my dad that year, I just don't have his contact info. We will still go see the lights, and visit family. That year many years ago, Christmas changed. It changed me. As I sit in tears, remembering the Son of God, I remember I am still a son because of him.
Merry Christmas. You are still loved, even without all the gifts.
Our Rotary Club has had a Sub for Santa for the Family Support Center. We buy gifts for a few families. This year, as a club they didn't fit in a large SUV. One year I went with my wife to pick out a couple of coats. One on this lady's list was over $100. it was a coat a contractor would buy to stay warm. I realized I hadn't ever purchased that nice of a coat for my wife, but she didn't say anything. This year we got 20 stockings and a few items to go with others for our Rotary project. We had our annual wrapping dinner and party. I made a note that "Santa" would need a ride later this year. It was neat to see the kids sit on his knee.
Christmas includes a few gifts, some of my wife's Rice Crispy treats to deliver to a few in the ward. What it really is: reading a couple of chapters in Matthew and Luke, one in Helaman, and one in 3rd Nephi. It means that because of Jesus and his atonement and resurrection, I didn't lose my dad that year, I just don't have his contact info. We will still go see the lights, and visit family. That year many years ago, Christmas changed. It changed me. As I sit in tears, remembering the Son of God, I remember I am still a son because of him.
Merry Christmas. You are still loved, even without all the gifts.
Saturday, November 24, 2018
Time to get rid of straight party voting in Utah
When referring to possible changes to elections I have stated:
"IF they really want to change elections, they should get rid of straight party voting as people can now get on the general election ballot as an unaffiliated candidate with signatures bypassing the political parties, and have been able to for many years. They just have a harder time wining with straight party voting. CMV v2.1 does nothing to help unaffiliated voters. That would."
As far as I can remember I have not voted straight party for an election. That goes back approx. 40 years.
I started promoting getting rid of straight party voting at least by Sep. 2017. See for example the bottom of this post.
http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2017/09/count-my-vote-or-blank-check-vote.html
When I updated the blog post after CMV amended their proposal it has the same suggestion at the bottom http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2017/11/count-my-vote-or-blank-check-vote.html
When I wrote my op-ed for the Salt Lake Tribune in Feb. 2018, it had the same suggestion.
https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2018/02/03/commentary-count-my-vote-would-take-away-accountability-of-elected-officials/
I realized I voted against 2016 HB 119 in committee Feb. 2, 2016, but I was very torn at the time (you can listen to my comments in the committee) have had time to reconsider.
https://le.utah.gov/av/committeeArchive.jsp?mtgID=14061&timelineID=71358
That decision had nothing to do with the 2018 election.
"IF they really want to change elections, they should get rid of straight party voting as people can now get on the general election ballot as an unaffiliated candidate with signatures bypassing the political parties, and have been able to for many years. They just have a harder time wining with straight party voting. CMV v2.1 does nothing to help unaffiliated voters. That would."
As far as I can remember I have not voted straight party for an election. That goes back approx. 40 years.
I started promoting getting rid of straight party voting at least by Sep. 2017. See for example the bottom of this post.
http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2017/09/count-my-vote-or-blank-check-vote.html
When I updated the blog post after CMV amended their proposal it has the same suggestion at the bottom http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2017/11/count-my-vote-or-blank-check-vote.html
When I wrote my op-ed for the Salt Lake Tribune in Feb. 2018, it had the same suggestion.
https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2018/02/03/commentary-count-my-vote-would-take-away-accountability-of-elected-officials/
I realized I voted against 2016 HB 119 in committee Feb. 2, 2016, but I was very torn at the time (you can listen to my comments in the committee) have had time to reconsider.
https://le.utah.gov/av/committeeArchive.jsp?mtgID=14061&timelineID=71358
That decision had nothing to do with the 2018 election.
Monday, October 1, 2018
Is Prop 2 ready to vote on
Is Prop 2 ready to vote yes on?
Just take 2 items for example.
$100 fine, but that isn't enforceable. You forget your license to transport or to be a patient, and they have to assume you are legit.
2 oz. of raw material every 2 weeks. Not in any form that has even been claimed to be medicine. You can't smoke the raw material (if they catch you) but you sure can legally heat and breath the vapors.
Two more for added measure, lets take away any city's say in where in their city locations can be. We don't do that for anything else, with the new exception of homeless shelters.
The green cross places can't advertise that they are selling, with the exception of the green cross and that they can advertise for employees.
Vote No on Prop. 2. It isn't ready.
Just take 2 items for example.
$100 fine, but that isn't enforceable. You forget your license to transport or to be a patient, and they have to assume you are legit.
2 oz. of raw material every 2 weeks. Not in any form that has even been claimed to be medicine. You can't smoke the raw material (if they catch you) but you sure can legally heat and breath the vapors.
Two more for added measure, lets take away any city's say in where in their city locations can be. We don't do that for anything else, with the new exception of homeless shelters.
The green cross places can't advertise that they are selling, with the exception of the green cross and that they can advertise for employees.
Vote No on Prop. 2. It isn't ready.
Saturday, July 7, 2018
Why voters Should Not vote for the Fuel Tax Shell Game
Why voters Should Not vote for the Fuel Tax Shell Game
Are we raising the Utah State fuel tax by 33% and somehow expecting it to go toward Public Education?
As
you likely know by now a “Nonbinding Opinion Question #1” is on the
ballot this fall which reads: "To provide additional funding for public
education and local roads, should the state increase the state motor and
special fuel tax rates by an equivalent of 10 cents per gallon?"
Besides the 33% Utah State fuel tax increase being proposed, there are some other major problems with the proposal. While you can use state sales tax money in any of at least three state budget areas, Transportation, Public Education and Higher Education, Education money from Income Tax is limited by the Utah State Constitution to only Public Education and Higher Education.
Fuel Tax money is limited by the Utah State Constitution to Transportation and Transportation items only, not public education.
To advertise that you are going to move taxpayer money around so you are using Transportation only money somewhere else violates at minimum the intent of the Utah Constitution.
Besides the 33% Utah State fuel tax increase being proposed, there are some other major problems with the proposal. While you can use state sales tax money in any of at least three state budget areas, Transportation, Public Education and Higher Education, Education money from Income Tax is limited by the Utah State Constitution to only Public Education and Higher Education.
Fuel Tax money is limited by the Utah State Constitution to Transportation and Transportation items only, not public education.
To advertise that you are going to move taxpayer money around so you are using Transportation only money somewhere else violates at minimum the intent of the Utah Constitution.
The
other issue with this proposed shell game is Transportation related
sales tax should also go to Transportation - based on the same section
in the Utah State Constitution. It is the sales tax going to
Transportation that this “shell game” plans to use to make this whole
scam “legal”.
With more Utah State Fuel Tax, the promoters of this tax increase think the State Legislature will reduce the amount of State Sales Tax being invested in Transportation and move that to Higher Education and then move more Higher Education money to Public Education.
With more Utah State Fuel Tax, the promoters of this tax increase think the State Legislature will reduce the amount of State Sales Tax being invested in Transportation and move that to Higher Education and then move more Higher Education money to Public Education.
By using Fuel Tax to increase the Education Fund, at some point you are either directly violating the Utah Constitution or at minimum violating the intent.
Is the idea of asking the voters to agree to this shell game scheme supposed to let the Utah Legislature and the Governor off the hook for not following the State Constitution?
Utah State Constitution, Art XXIII Sec. 5 https://le.utah.gov/xcode/ArticleXIII/Article_XIII,_Section_5.html?v=UC_AXIII_S5_1800010118000101
Income Tax only for Public Education and Higher Education:
“5) All revenue from taxes on intangible property or from a tax on income shall be used to support the systems of public education and higher education as defined in Article X, Section 2.
Fuel tax and Transportation related sales tax only for Transportation:
“6) Proceeds from fees, taxes, and other charges related to the operation of motor vehicles on public highways and proceeds from an excise tax on liquid motor fuel used to propel those motor vehicles shall be used for: (a) statutory refunds and adjustments and costs of collection and administration; (b) the construction, maintenance, and repair of State and local roads, including payment for property taken for or damaged by rights-of-way and for associated administrative costs; (c) driver education; (d) enforcement of state motor vehicle and traffic laws; and (e) the payment of the principal of and interest on any obligation of the State or a city or county, issued for any of the purposes set forth in Subsection (6)(b) and to which any of the fees, taxes, or other charges described in this Subsection (6) have been pledged, including any paid to the State or a city or county, as provided by statute. “
There
is already a major issue with the Education Fund when the Board of
Regents can raise Higher Education tuition without approval from the
State Legislature, when they don’t get all the money they want. This
increase in the Fuel Tax will not solve that issue.
Vote No on Question #1. We don’t need any more “shell games”.
[Update]
The most stable and most long term funding of roads in Utah is not the fuel tax. It is the transportation related sales tax. That includes electric cars and tires for any car. Based on the state constitution the transportation related sales tax also goes to transportation. Currently about $579 Million per year. The #utleg has been using the number 17% of the overall sales tax as the approx. value that is transportation related. Based on the 17% number there is currently approx. $18 Million extra money from sales tax going into Transportation. Question 1 proposes to move approx. $125 Million from the sales tax to Education Fund. That means it is in violation of the state constitution. That doesn't even get into that the fuel Tax can't be used for education, with the exception of drivers education.
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Original Sponsored Bills from 2011 to 2016
Some comments in the current Election mentioned my effectiveness. I can
make this bill list look much larger and pad this list with Co-Sponsored
Bills, but those bills are sponsored by someone else and you just sign
to endorse them. No other work is required.
Original Sponsored Bills
(Not including Substitute versions, Co-Sponsored or Floor Sponsored Bills, or amendments to other bills or helping pass or defeat other bills)
2011
HB0221S01 Classic Car Inspections (Gov. Signed)
HB0227 Test Driving Vehicles (Industry Changed)
HB0281 Sex Offender and Kidnapping Amendments (See 2012)
HB0377 Higher Education Textbook Fairness Act (Agency Changed Policy)
HB0380 Utah Lands Protection Act (See 2012)
Several Redistricting map proposals
2012
HB0018S01 Kidnapping Offender Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0067S03 Storm Water Capture Amendments (See 2013)
HB0209S01 Utah Lands Protection Act (Alternate Bill passed)
HB0262 Building Code Amendments (Modified in 2013)
2013 (Sponsored for 2013, Transferred, passed and Gov. signed)
HB0036 Storm Water Capture Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0215 Water Quality Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0262 Unaffiliated Voter Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0338 Alimony Revisions (passed, Gov. Signed)
2015
HB0029 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board Amendments (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0126S02 Design Professionals - Amendments (Alternate Passed in 2016)
HB0162 Construction Trades Continuing Education Amendments (See 2016)
HB0177S02 Modifications to Voting Law (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0243 Vintage Vehicle Amendments (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0281 Revisions to Elections Law
HB0286 Building Code Amendments (Alternate Bill Passed 2016)
HB0448 Disabled Adult Child Guardianship (1/2 passed in another bill)
HB0450 Licensing Modifications (See 2016)
Alternate to moving the Draper Prison
2016
HB0011S02 Referendum Amendments
HB0065S01 Exemption from Daylight Saving Time
HB0069 Qualified Political Party Amendments
HB0080 Vehicle Impound Amendments
HB0101S02 Disabled Adult Guardianship Amendments (Passed and Gov. Signed)
HB0108 Licensing Amendments
HB0109 Construction Trades Education Amendments (Alternate Passed)
HB0125 Fire Code Amendments (Alternate Construction and Fire Codes Passed)
HB0152S01 Voted and Board Local Levy Modifications (passed in HB1)
HB0256 Net Metering of Electricity Amendments
HB0261 Wood Burning Stoves Amendments
HB0269 Recycling of Copper Wire (Passed and Gov Signed)
HB0361 Air Quality Modifications (Included in other passed bill)
HB0429 Specie Legal Tender Amendments
HJR011 Joint Resolution Designating Utah as a Purple Heart State (Passed and Lt. Gov. Signed)
See also:
http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2016/04/floor-power-rating-and-bill-sponsor.html
Also see the Session Update for each year
Original Sponsored Bills
(Not including Substitute versions, Co-Sponsored or Floor Sponsored Bills, or amendments to other bills or helping pass or defeat other bills)
2011
HB0221S01 Classic Car Inspections (Gov. Signed)
HB0227 Test Driving Vehicles (Industry Changed)
HB0281 Sex Offender and Kidnapping Amendments (See 2012)
HB0377 Higher Education Textbook Fairness Act (Agency Changed Policy)
HB0380 Utah Lands Protection Act (See 2012)
Several Redistricting map proposals
2012
HB0018S01 Kidnapping Offender Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0067S03 Storm Water Capture Amendments (See 2013)
HB0209S01 Utah Lands Protection Act (Alternate Bill passed)
HB0262 Building Code Amendments (Modified in 2013)
2013 (Sponsored for 2013, Transferred, passed and Gov. signed)
HB0036 Storm Water Capture Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0215 Water Quality Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0262 Unaffiliated Voter Amendments (passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0338 Alimony Revisions (passed, Gov. Signed)
2015
HB0029 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Board Amendments (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0126S02 Design Professionals - Amendments (Alternate Passed in 2016)
HB0162 Construction Trades Continuing Education Amendments (See 2016)
HB0177S02 Modifications to Voting Law (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0243 Vintage Vehicle Amendments (Passed, Gov. Signed)
HB0281 Revisions to Elections Law
HB0286 Building Code Amendments (Alternate Bill Passed 2016)
HB0448 Disabled Adult Child Guardianship (1/2 passed in another bill)
HB0450 Licensing Modifications (See 2016)
Alternate to moving the Draper Prison
2016
HB0011S02 Referendum Amendments
HB0065S01 Exemption from Daylight Saving Time
HB0069 Qualified Political Party Amendments
HB0080 Vehicle Impound Amendments
HB0101S02 Disabled Adult Guardianship Amendments (Passed and Gov. Signed)
HB0108 Licensing Amendments
HB0109 Construction Trades Education Amendments (Alternate Passed)
HB0125 Fire Code Amendments (Alternate Construction and Fire Codes Passed)
HB0152S01 Voted and Board Local Levy Modifications (passed in HB1)
HB0256 Net Metering of Electricity Amendments
HB0261 Wood Burning Stoves Amendments
HB0269 Recycling of Copper Wire (Passed and Gov Signed)
HB0361 Air Quality Modifications (Included in other passed bill)
HB0429 Specie Legal Tender Amendments
HJR011 Joint Resolution Designating Utah as a Purple Heart State (Passed and Lt. Gov. Signed)
See also:
http://fredcox4utah.blogspot.com/2016/04/floor-power-rating-and-bill-sponsor.html
Also see the Session Update for each year
Monday, April 2, 2018
60 vs 70 percent threashold Are we really going to debate this again
60/40 vs 70% threashold - are we really going to debate this again?
For years, the SCC and State Delegates debated the threshold for convention to
primary elections. I was and I am still a supporter of the 60/40
threshold we currently have, despite the fact that I lost getting 40%+
by 2 or 3 votes out of 70 delegates (100% voting) in 2016 and didn't
make it to a primary.
This State Convention there is again a proposal to change the party constitution to 70%. If
it passes, it would not effect the 2018 races Do we still want to
continue this fight?
The 60/40 allowed a challenger to eliminate an incumbent in 2016 for at least 2 Utah House races, including me. I am running again this year and I am not
getting signatures. I am willing to take the risk with the 60/40 again
as I did in 2014 and 2016. I won in 2014 at convention and also won in
the general election. If the threshold had been changed to 70/30, it is
likely that a democrat would have won that year.
Remember
that CMV in 2013 always had more than one demand. It was never just the
threshold. Even though adjusting the threshold would not
have helped Gov. Walker in 2004 or Sen. Bennett in 2010, CMV using Y2
polled the delegates in 2012 and found that the Sen. Bennett would still
not have received 40%+ with the delegates that year either.
(Information released by Quin Monson at the Young Republican Convention)
I wrote this in May 2013. It is still true.
The threshold to avoid a primary is a two way sword.
An 85/15 would make it easier for a weak challenger to get to a primary,
but impossible to eliminate the incumbent without large amounts of
money or fame. That was the Count My Vote / Buy My Vote request
originally. Added to that the eliminating of any kind of multiple round
and you could have 6 candidates in the primary, one of which would
always be the incumbent.
They couldn't get 85/15, so they next tried 75/25. Almost impossible for an incumbent not to get 25% and make it to a primary. Yes, the incumbent is going to have a harder time getting 75%, but if the goal is more primaries that cost more money, it is one step closer to Buy My Vote or Buy My Ads. Add the elimination of the multiple round and you could get 3 or 4 candidates going to the primary. 70/30 allows up to 3 and again makes it harder to eliminate an incumbent.
Yes, the goal of 60/40 may have been to help the incumbents, but after Jason Chaffetz almost won in convention and Bennett and Gov. Walker lost, those that wanted to protect the incumbents realized they made a mistake with the 60/40 and many for years have wanted to switch it back. Two legislators were eliminated at convention this year. And yes, we still have some primaries, but not as many as we get with 2/3 or 70%.
In 2012 Utah, we have primaries: Hatch/Liljenquist, Dougall/Johnson, Swallow/Reyes, McCartney/Valdez, Okerlund/Painter, Vickers/Anderson, Perry/Galvez, Redd/Butterfield, Anderegg/Moore, Handy/Crowder, Macdonald/Bagley, Sagers/McCoy, Kennedy/Nitta, Muniz/Hendrickson, Stratton/Murray, Christofferson/Kane, Greene/Stevens, Layton/Daw, Nelson/Wright, Westwood/Carling, and Crockett/Winder, to name a few. Not every race had a primary nor should it. Most of those were GOP primaries.
Since 2000, 1/2 of all state wide and congressional contested GOP races have gone to primary. 44 races, 30 were contested and 15 went to primary.
Yes a 2/3 threshold would have made a few more primaries, but the risk of an incumbent losing, or someone rich or famous losing would also go down.
Some that spoke for the 2/3 or 70% may believe what they have said, but I totally disagree and many in the SCC and also many of the delegates disagree as well.
I have always said, The 60% threshold to avoid a primary works, allowing a shot of a challenger to eliminate an incumbent and yet requires a challenger to be a strong candidate.
The current system does not protect the incumbent, wealthy or famous. I think that is a good thing. Finely tuned balance. It won today.
(originally posted 18 May 2013)
They couldn't get 85/15, so they next tried 75/25. Almost impossible for an incumbent not to get 25% and make it to a primary. Yes, the incumbent is going to have a harder time getting 75%, but if the goal is more primaries that cost more money, it is one step closer to Buy My Vote or Buy My Ads. Add the elimination of the multiple round and you could get 3 or 4 candidates going to the primary. 70/30 allows up to 3 and again makes it harder to eliminate an incumbent.
Yes, the goal of 60/40 may have been to help the incumbents, but after Jason Chaffetz almost won in convention and Bennett and Gov. Walker lost, those that wanted to protect the incumbents realized they made a mistake with the 60/40 and many for years have wanted to switch it back. Two legislators were eliminated at convention this year. And yes, we still have some primaries, but not as many as we get with 2/3 or 70%.
In 2012 Utah, we have primaries: Hatch/Liljenquist, Dougall/Johnson, Swallow/Reyes, McCartney/Valdez, Okerlund/Painter, Vickers/Anderson, Perry/Galvez, Redd/Butterfield, Anderegg/Moore, Handy/Crowder, Macdonald/Bagley, Sagers/McCoy, Kennedy/Nitta, Muniz/Hendrickson, Stratton/Murray, Christofferson/Kane, Greene/Stevens, Layton/Daw, Nelson/Wright, Westwood/Carling, and Crockett/Winder, to name a few. Not every race had a primary nor should it. Most of those were GOP primaries.
Since 2000, 1/2 of all state wide and congressional contested GOP races have gone to primary. 44 races, 30 were contested and 15 went to primary.
Yes a 2/3 threshold would have made a few more primaries, but the risk of an incumbent losing, or someone rich or famous losing would also go down.
Some that spoke for the 2/3 or 70% may believe what they have said, but I totally disagree and many in the SCC and also many of the delegates disagree as well.
I have always said, The 60% threshold to avoid a primary works, allowing a shot of a challenger to eliminate an incumbent and yet requires a challenger to be a strong candidate.
The current system does not protect the incumbent, wealthy or famous. I think that is a good thing. Finely tuned balance. It won today.
(originally posted 18 May 2013)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)